Search for: "HILL v. AC"
Results 1 - 20
of 110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2021, 3:46 pm
So when I first read the facts of this case, and saw that it was a lawsuit brought by someone in a tony Hollywood Hills residence against his neighbor for "private nuisance" claiming that the neighbor's AC pool pump were allegedly too loud, I thought: "Get real, dude. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 5:52 am
It's Ancon Ltd v ACS Stainless Steel Fixings Ltd [2008] EWHC 2489 (Pat) is a Patents Court decision for England and Wales from Mr Justice Patten.Ancon owned a patent for a channel assembly. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 2:48 am
An assault on Hill? [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 11:47 am
Morgan Hill Concerned Parents Assoc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 5:55 pm
County of Cook, 884 F.2d 1043, 1047 (7th Cir. 1989), quoting Hill v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm
This morning the Court announced its decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm
Hill (1995) 27 HLR 368; Lambeth London Borough Council v Hughes (2001) 33 HLR 33. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm
Hill (1995) 27 HLR 368; Lambeth London Borough Council v Hughes (2001) 33 HLR 33. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:36 pm
This morning the Court announced its decision in King v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm
In Morgan Hill Concerned Parents Assoc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:09 am
In the recent case of Stancil v. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 3:39 am
The case of Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1989] AC 53 is not authority for the proposition that the police enjoy a general immunity from suit in respect of anything done by them in the course of investigating or preventing crime. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 12:12 pm
In today’s case (Hill v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm
Ariel and I, along with a very smart young law professor named David Lametti, who later became Minister of Justice, made the prevailing arguments in the SCC in the 2015 case of Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am
Comment This case is significant for two reasons: First, it tasks the Supreme Court with answering the question raised obiter by Lady Hale in Savage v South Essex NHS Trust [2009] 1 AC 653, namely “what is the extent of the state’s duty to protect all people against an immediate risk of self-harm? [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:22 am
In Perini/Tompkins Joint Venture v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 3:40 am
It has never been in dispute that the police can be liable in tort to those injured as a direct result of acts or omissions by the police: see, for example Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [1989] AC 53, [59B-C]. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 1:21 am
The majority, however, buries Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [1989] AC 53 – whose public policy justifications have been inverted. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm
Monk [1992] AC 478) to reach the higher Courts. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm
Monk [1992] AC 478) to reach the higher Courts. [read post]
